|
1.4 Categorising Using IUCN
Criteria
Figure 5 presents a simplified form of the International
Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN)
threatened species categories and criteria (IUCN 1994). These criteria
are used to assess taxa for listing in The Red Data Book which highlights
those species most at risk and in need of conservation.
(See Extentention on E4)
To assess the status of the RTBC we need to draw
together the results gained in sections 1.1-1.3 and place them on
the continuum of degrees of threat, as presented by Figure 5.
Figure 5. Simplified
IUCN Conservation Status Criteria (IUCN 1994)
| Population |
|
| Range |
|
| Decline |
|
| |
Critical
|
Endangered |
Vulnerable |
Conservation
Dependent/Near Threatened/Other |
| <250 mature
individuals.(m.i.) |
<2,500 m.i. |
<10,000 m.i. |
Taxon receiving
conservation management without which it would qualify at higher
levels within 5 years/not Con. Dept. but close to Vulnerable
category/Data Deficient etc. |
<100km² E.O.(*1)
or <10km² A.O. (*2) |
<5,000km²
E.O. or <500km² A.O. |
<20,000km²
E.O. or <2,000km² A.O. |
| >80% decline
over 10 years, or 3 generations (*3) |
>50% over 10
years, or 3 generations |
>20% over 10
years, or 3 generations |
*1 Extent of
Occurrence: all known, inferred or projected sites of present
occurrence.
*2 Area of Occupancy: area within the E.O. which is occupied
by the taxon (excludes unused habitat).
*3 Generation: can be assumed to be c. 4 years for RTBC (age
of full adult plumage). |
Q.8 Transfer
your answers to questions 1, 3 and 6 to Figure 5 by placing a solid
circle at the three points on the continuum that you think best
represent RTBC population, range and decline. 
The IUCN employs the precautionary principle,
or responsible pessimism (Collar et.al. 1994), to their
assessments; this means that taxa are classified at the highest
level of threat for which a value is recorded, not necessarily the
criterion which corresponds with the greatest number of population
parameters (IUCN 1994).
Q.9 With
the above in mind, what classification do you think the RTBC would
receive? 
Q.10 Do
you agree with this classification? 
Extension
1.
What % world birds are classified as threatened?
(E.4)
2.
Australian birds ? (E.3)
3.
What subspecies are there of the RTBC and what is their conservation
status? (E.5)
4. Should subspecies receive equal classification
and conservation effort as full species?

|