|
1.3 Decline
As Figure 2 revealed, no comprehensive surveys
were carried out until recently, making direct and accurate estimation
of population decline impossible. Despite this limitation, a rough
estimate can still be made for the purposes of this exercise by
extrapolating current population density to past, inferred range.
This can be done by:
- Noting the limits of previous sightings
and specimens on Figure 2 (plus Red Rock, 30 km north-west of
Melbourne, not shown).
- Noting that the birds seem to be dependent
upon Brown/Desert Stringybark (Eucalyptus baxteri/arenacea) for
food and roosting for much of the year (72% feeding records, Joseph
1982).
- Combining the historical records with the
map of distribution of Brown/Desert Stringybark (Figure 3) and
making two assumptions: that past range*2 approximated to the
area of stringybark, and that birds did not occur west of The
Murray River in S.A. nor east of Melbourne, Vic. Record this area
in km2. (For a detailed map of past
habitat, see www.redtail.com.au)
Figure
3. Past Distribution RTBC and Stringybark

|
This figure can be cautiously compared with those for the
present day by:
- Recording approximate present population, as per Q.
1.
- range*2 by examining Figure 3 and
estimating the % of range *1 covered by native vegetation,
which we will call range*2. (To enable calculation we will
identify all native vegetation on Figure 3 within range
*1 as Brown/Desert Stringybark forest).
- Dividing population by range*2 to get simple population
density per km2. Record this figure for use in question
5.
|
Note: *1 and 2 There are two measures
of range: 1.Extent of Occurrence (as mentioned in Q.3), and 2. Area
of Occupancy (A.O.), which is the area within the E.O. that is occupied
by a species - e.g. the area utilised for feeding etc - and does
not count unutilised zones, such as cleared or urban land.
Joseph (1982) stated that he thought that the birds seemed
to be more or less evenly distributed.
Figure 4. Present
Distribution RTBC and Stringybark

Q.4 Estimate
past range area by counting the squares and percentage of squares
on Figure3 occupied by stringybark between The Murray River and
Melbourne. 
Q.5 Multiply
the figure calculated in question 4 by the population density determined
previously, to arrive at a past population figure. By what % may
the population have declined? 
Q.6 The
environment of south-east S.A. and western Victoria began to be
altered by settlers from around the 1830s onward. If we make 1830
the base year, how much may population have declined/year to the
present day? (assuming constant rate of decline). How much (%) would
this be in 10 or 20 years? 
Q.7 We have
made numerous assumptions and strung assumptions together to reach
a figure for rate of decline: criticise the process.

|